Julie A. Havens                                          
Julie Havens

 PhD Candidate
 University of Arkansas
 Department of Biological Sciences
 email: havens@uark.edu
 Advisor: Dr. William Etges


Curriculum Vitae


Research Interests:

Research in our lab focuses on ecological genetics, evolution and speciation.  Currently, I am investigating sexual selection in the desert fly Drosophila mojavensis; a species endemic to the Sonoran Desert and adjacent arid lands.  Geographically isolated by the Gulf of California, allopatric populations of this species differ morphologically and cytologically (Johnson, 1980; Etges et al. 1999), and show differences in host cactus preferences (Heed, 1982) and life history traits (Etges, 1990; 1993). Cytological evidence suggests that Baja populations are ancestral to mainland populations, and that derived populations colonized the mainland by switching host plants (Heed, 1978; Etges, 1990; 1993).  In the lab, premating isolation has long been observed  (Zouros & D’Entremont, 1980; Markow et al. 1983; Koepfer 1987a, 1987b; Krebs & Markow 1989; Markow, 1991).   Thus, allopatric populations are considered to be incipient species. Recently, I have been investigating how mate choice differs among populations, and how it is influenced by environment.  D.mojavensis uses more than one host cactus for feeding and breeding, making it an ideal system with which to investigate environmental influences on mate choice. Ancestral populations from Baja use primarily pitaya agria, Stenocereus gummoses, while  mainland populations have colonized organ pipe cactus, S. thurberi. One of the main hypotheses proposed to explain the premating isolation observed between allopatric populations is that mate choice patterns have changed as a consequence of adaptation to different host plants. Mate choice has been investigated between allopatric populations, in an effort to uncover the traits involved in sexual isolation.  Within population mate choice, however, has received considerably less attention.  

agria fruitTo investigate sexual selection, I manipulated the opportunity for mate choice within 2 populations reared on 2 different host cacti.  The study was designed to both allow for and deprive the opportunity for mate choice, and to measure 2 ecologically relevant components of fitness; viability and egg-to-adult development time in the offspring.  I found that the opportunity for mate choice led to significantly decreased offspring development time. This pattern was population and environment specific, with mainland flies reared on organ pipe cactus showing the greatest difference due to mate choice treatment.  These results suggest that mate choice confers an indirect genetic fitness to females, consistent with the 'good genes' mechanism of sexual selection.  Many studies of  sexual selection have not incorporated the effects of  the environment.  The results of this study suggest that 'good genes' sexual selection may not be a general process, and that a complete understanding of this mechanism will require direct investigation of environmental influences.


Mate choice in D. mojavensis is mediated by courtship song, and cuticular hydrocarbons which function as pheromones (Etges & Ahrens, 2001).  Current research shows that there are significant differences in cuticular hydrocarbon components between mated and unmated male and female flies when mate choice is allowed.  This indicates that cuticular hydrocarbons are secondary sexual traits involved in within population mate choice.  Whether there is a genetic correlation between genes influencing hydrocarbon expression, life history traits, and mate choice is unknown.

Mate choice in D. mojavensis is thought to be governed primarily by female choice, as there has been no observed male-male competition, or significant differences in male mating propensity (Brazner & Etges, 1993; Etges, 1998).  Further research is needed to conclusively determine the specific mechanism of sexual selection in this species,  and how it is influenced by the environment.


References

ETGES, W.J. 1990. Direction of life history evolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Pp. 37-56 in J.S.F. Barker, W.T. Starmer, and R.J. MacIntyre, eds. Ecological and evolutionary genetics of Drosophila. Plenum, New York.
ETGES, W.J.1993.  Genetics of host-cactus response and life-history evolution among ancestral and derived populations of cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis.  Evolution 47(3): 750-767.
ETGES, W. J. AND AHRENS, M.A. 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval-rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolated populations.  The American Naturalist 158:585-597.
HEED, W.B. 1978.  Ecology and genetics of Sonoran Desert Drosophila.  Pp. 109-126 in P.F. Brussard, ed. Proceedings in the life sciences, ecological genetics: the interface.  Springer, New York. HEED, W.B. 1982. The origin of Drosophila in the Sonoran Desert. In Barker, J.S.F. & Starmer, W.T. (eds). , Ecological Genetics and Evolution: The Cactus-Yeast-Drosophila Model System, Academic Press, Sydney, pp. 65-80.
JOHNSON, W.R. 1980. Chromosomal Polymorphism in the Desert-Adapted Species, Drosophila mojavensis.  Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
KOEPFER, R. 1987a. Selection for sexual isolation between geographic forms of Drosophila mojavensis. I. Interactions between the selected forms. Evolution 41:37-48.
KOEPFER, R. 1987b. Selection for sexual isolation between geographic forms of Drosophila mojavensis. II. Effects of selection of mating preference and propensity. Evolution 41(6): 1409-1413.
KREBS, R.A. & MARKOW, T.A. 1989. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation in Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 43:908-912.
MARKOW, T.A.,  FOGLEMAN, J.C. & HEED, W.B. 1983.  Reproductive isolation in Sonoran Desert  Drosophila. Evolution 37:649-652.
MARKOW, T.A., 1991.  Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 45:1525-1529.
ZOUROS, E. AND D’ENTREMONT, C.J. 1980. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34(3): 421-430.

 

You are visitor number 409, since April 2009