Thomas Senor's

Philosophy of Religion Course Page


Greetings.   This is the course homepage for PHIL 4303, Philosophy of Religion. I'll try to keep this page reasonably current and include course reading assignments and handouts, announcements, writing assignments, etc.


Final Exam:
The final exam is Thursday, December 7th at  7:30 a.m.  (no, that's not a typo!).  Study questions will be emailed to you and posted on this page by Thursday, November 30th.

Study Questions (updated December 5th)


Midterm Exam:
The midterm for this course will be on Tuesday, October 10th.  Stay tuned for more details.

Study Questions for the Midterm exam.


Undergraduate Paper Assignments:

The bottom line on the paper assignment is that you are to write an essay of 6-8 pages in length (with a 12 point font and standard margins). Your paper should be a philosophical response to an article that you read outside of the standard course readings. You should spend approximately half of your paper laying out the argument or position that you will be responding to.  Make sure that you are clear and charitable in your interpretation. The second half of your paper will be your philosophical interaction with the paper you've been discussing.   You should offer a philosophical evaluation of its argument. Is it valid?  Are the premises plausible?  How could one or more of them be made dubious or shown to be false?   What might the defender of the argument say to your criticisms? Are there plausible objections to the argument that you believe can be shown not to work?   There are a lot of different ways these papers can go. The goal is to write a paper that fairly, clearly, and accurately presents the argument/position of the paper you’ve chosen, and that discusses that argument/position philosophically.

 

Below are two websites that each contains a great variety of papers on topics relevant to our course. My intention is that you write on a paper found on one of these sites. However, not all the papers on either site are appropriate. Some of them are about topics beyond the scope of the philosophy of religion (for instance, any paper on the reliability of the Bible would fall into this category). So here’s what I want you to do.  Peruse the papers on one or both websites. Find an essay that you think is relevant to our course and that interests you, and send me the link to the paper.  I’ll have a look at it and tell you if it’s all right to write on.

 

On the first site you will find papers that are critical of religion in general, and of theism in particular; the second website generally contains papers that are either neutral or favorably disposed toward religious claims. I mention this because it is easier to take on an article that argues for a conclusion that you think is false.

 

You must have an approved paper to write about by the Thanksgiving break. Since I might disallow a given paper as being appropriate, I strongly recommend that you not wait until the Monday before the break to look at the papers and email your request to me.  You may send me the link to the paper you’d like to respond to anytime after you get this email.  I ask only that you send me one request at a time; I’ll give you a thumbs up or thumbs down within 24 hours.  If you later decide to change your topic that is fine so long as it is prior to the Thanksgiving break and you get your new topic cleared with me.

 

Your paper is due on the last day of class.  Please turn in both a hard copy of your paper and a hard copy of the essay you are responding to.

 

One more thing: if you’d like to write on something other than an essay from one of these sites, I’m happy to hear you out. But if you write on something not found on these sites and you have not received permission from me to do this, your paper will not be accepted.

 

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theism/arguments.html

 

http://www.apollos.ws/philosophy-of-religion-article/

 

Good luck!

 

Tom



Readings:

Here are the reading assignments that I've assigned thus far.  All readings and page numbers refer to our primary text, Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology, fourth edition (Wadsworth), edited by Louis P. Pojman, except where otherwise noted.

The Cosmological Argument
I.A.5 The Kalam Cosmological Argument by William Lane Craig
I.A.7 A Critique of the Kalam Cosmological Argument by Paul Draper
I.A.4 An Examination of the Cosmological Argument by William Rowe<>

The Telelological Argument
I.B The Teleological Argument for the Existence of God
I.B.1 The Watch and the Watchmaker by William Paley
I.B.2 A Critique of the Design Argument by David Hume (please read these for Tuesday, September 5th)
Supplement to Paley, part 1 and part 2    (please download and read these for Thursday, September 7th--read the paragraph marked "Start" from p1, then read p2, then read other paragraph  from part 1).
I.B.3 The Argument from Design, pp. 59-64, by Richard Swinburne (please read for Thursday, September 7th)
"God, Design, and Fine-Tuning," by Robin Collins (please read for Tuesday, September 12th)

The Ontological Argument
I.C.1 The Ontological Argument by St. Anselm
I.C.2. A Critique of the Ontological Argument by Immanuel Kant (please read these for Tuesday, September  19th)

The Problem of Evil
III.1. The Argument from Evil by David Hume
III.5. Evil and Omnipotence by J.L. Mackie
III.6  The Free Will Defense by Alvin Plantinga (please read by Tuesday September 26th)
III.7 The Iniductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe (please read by Tuesday, October 3rd)

The Attributes of God
IV.A.1 Temporal Eternity by Stephen T. Davis
IV A.2. The God Beyond Time by Hugh McCann (please read this and the previous essay by Thursday, October  5th)
Omniscience and the Problem of Foreknowledge and Freedom by Thomas Senor
IV.B.3 God's Foreknowledge and Human Free Will Are Compatible. by Alvin Plantinga  (please read my paper on omniscience and the Plantinga article for Tuesday, October 17th)
Omnipotence: A Primer by Thomas Senor
IV.C.2 Some Puzzles Concerning Omnipotence by George Mavrodes (please read my paper on omnipotence and the Mavrodes piece for Thursday, October 19th)
On Privileging God's Goodness by Eric Funkhouser
God's Goodness Needs No Privilege: A Reply to Funkhouser  by Thomas Senor (please read Dr. Funk's paper and my reply by Thursday, October 26th)

Death and Immortality
V1.2 The Finality of Death by Bertrand Russell
V1.3  Immortality and Resurrection by John Hick (please read  the Russell and Hick papers for Tuesday, October 31st)
V1.4  Personal Identity and Life After Death by Jeffrey Olen (please read this paper--and the one below it-- by Thursday, November 2nd)

Faith and Reason
VII.B.1  The Wager by Blaise Pascal (please read this paper by Thursday, November 2nd)
VII.B.2  The Ethics of Belief by W.K. Clifford
VII B.3 The Will to Believe by William James (please read this and the previous paper by Thursday, November 9th)
VII D.2 Religious Belief Without Evidence by Alvin Plantinga
VII.D.3 A Critique of Plantinga's Religious Epistemology by Michael Martin (please have this and the previous paper by Tuesday, November 14th)

Can God Be Free? by William Rowe (Oxford University Press, 2004)
Chapter 1:  Leibniz on Divine Perfection and Freedom (please read this chapter by Thursday, November 16th)
Chapter 2:  Clarke on Divine Perfection and Freedom (please read this chapter by  Tuesday, November 21st)
Chapter 3:  Aquinas on the Infinity of Worlds
Chapter 4:  Edwards on Divine and Human Freedom (please read Chapters 3 and 4 by Tuesday, November 28th)
Chapter 5:  Must God Create the Best World?
Chapter 6:  Divine Perfection and Freedom: The Contemporary Debate  (please read Chapter 5 and  sections I-IV of Chapter 6 for Thursday, November 30th)
Chapter 7:  Can God Be the Cause of His Own Nature? (please read sections V-IX of Chapter 6 for Tuesday, December 5th)



Handouts:  *Change in policy*  You must now come to class to get the handouts.

Course Syllabus
Truth and Religion
Kalam (Causal ) Argument
The Contingency Argument
An Argument Against the PSR
The Argument from Design I --Paley and Hume
The Argument from Design II --Swinburne
The Argument from Design III -- Fine-Tuning